The defendants argue that the plaintiff cannot prevail on theclaims made in these consolidated proceedings. Having considered the record, thewritten submissions of the parties specifically addressing thedefendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, their arguments, and theapplicable law, Bally's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED for the reasons set forthbelow. This matter is before the Courtpursuant to 28 U.S.C. At thatpoint, the defendant filed a supplemental memorandum to which theplaintiff filed formal reply.
Plaintiff, SamuelMichael Schildkraut ('Schildkraut'), filed a formal oppositionmemorandum and thereafter supplemented his response. d/b/a Bally's HoldingCompany (hereinafter referred to as 'Bally's').
Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed onbehalf of the defendants, Bally's Casino of New Orleans, LLC,d/b/a Belle of Orleans, LLC, d/b/a Bally's Casino LakeshoreResort, d/b/a Bally's Louisiana, Inc., Park Place/Bally'sEntertainment Corporation d/b/a Park Place EntertainmentCorporation d/b/a Caesars Entertainment, Inc., Bally's MidwestCasino, Inc.
